>>104372529>Mocking people for who they are would be making fun of people for being black or gay or retarded.We already do, in fact, we still do mock intrinsic values, they are just intrinsic traits that are not part of the protected class that your brain cares about until suddenly you act like you're moral for acting those bigoted assholes, like when it comes to Apu ( even that cretin who complained about him was right, part of the humor was the fact that he was an Indian shopkeep, and there is fucking nothing wrong with that), but not when it comes to Cletus. Ugliness is still mocked. Height is still mocked. Many genetic traits are the part of a joke. Group identities are part of jokes. The "protected class" in fact, haven't seen the jokes done tied to their inherent qualities die out, they are just now reversed. And they will never die out because "racism" is a normal healthy human trait that shouldn't be vilified by people like you.
>The "taboo" lies in the fact that you're mocking people not for things they've said or done, but for merely existing. Ha, what a fucking joke. There is NO black joke that is made on the basis of just being black and you know it. None. There is always a context to them, and it always has to do with how blacks behave. All those Johnny Rebel music that make a mockery of blacks, it isn't just because of the skin color, its because of their behavior. All of it is. But you can't make fun of that behavior either, its taboo, and all the funny black jokes are done because the taboo and subversive quality is saying what they thought, but never expressed. Even the black jokes on 4chan, since the very beginning, was always about their behavior.
>Mocking the marginalizedThere is no such thing as the "marginalized" in comedy. Rather, you just make them a protective class immune to criticism. Maybe if blacks actually got the ruthless criticism that comes out of humor, the fucking horror that is modern day black culture wouldn't exist.
