>>102834940>The root of anti-natalism is selfishness
Especially here where people talk about White Genocide and killing all the minorities this is always quickly exposed as bullshit. The same people spouting it also think that not only should most of the world's population not reproduce, they should die. And the reasonable outcome of their line of thinking is that people should have to pass a bunch of genetic tests in order to reproduce.
Anyway, what's your end game here? There are seven and a half billion people on Earth. If every single person had as many kids as possible, there would be what, 9.720 Trillion people on Earth in three generations? The climate shit is already an existential problem. Maybe if people went back to a shittier way of living we could survive as a species for a few more centuries before mass die-offs started. As is, the only real reason overpopulation isn't as big of a problem as people thought is that once people reach a decent quality of life without dying young, they naturally have fewer or no kids. It would be in our best to have policies to slowly decrease the total world population instead. If you look at countries where everybody has tons of kids, they're usually inventing fuck all and it's because that survival strategy is about pumping out a ton of kids and hoping a few of them survive to adulthood, not investing in their education, innovation, or happiness. It's the strategy insects have. But what the fuck is the endgame? Just keep doing that until the species becomes extinct, possibly ruining the ecosystem first? What's the goddamn point of breeding and living like rabbits? Have you been to poor African regions where having kids no matter what is the main motivator to see what great places they are?