>>102292211What I Don't get is: it's one thing to change a sexy character whose joke is that she was always sexually harrased for her body. But it's another thing to change a character who is sexually confident, not afraid to flaunt her goods and enjoy the attention. Like, what is the message you're trying to send here?
When it comes to sexy confidant women in media, there is always this sort of bipolar reaction from the female audience. It can go from "yas queen she's so confidant in herself, gurl power!!" to "this fucking character is a sexist archetype tailored specifically for the male gaze ree!!"
Like, what the fuck is the correct representation then?!
