>>102244513No, I don't mean anything funny. I mean it's possible Tat is into legit hurting people for the sexual thrill, and that's why his comics constantly depict sex as this horrible, destructive experience. The personification of masculinity is an executioner who wanders around town with a medieval mace to bash women with.
In fairness to Tat, that is 100% in line with Dworkin, so he could be merely inspired by her. But I remember back in college reading a feminist essay on my own time, where a women's study professor complained how hard it was to get people behind her message when they saw for their own eyes that her message wasn't true.
She'd do this firebrand speeches about how porn was torture, and describe in graphic detail hanging women from met hooks. She was trying to convince people that all porn was snuff, basically. After one of her speeches, she approached a man from the audience, and the guy actually laughed in her face, saying the porn she described was illegal and not at all the type of thing he watched.
The rest of the essay dealt with trying to figure out a way to adjust the message to get the audience to respond to the anti-porn message, knowing that too many men weren't ignorant enough to believe snuff was the only kind of porn.
But Tat acts like snuff IS the only kind of porn. So... what's that say about him? Most guys know what porn looks like, so surely you can't attribute it to ignorance. Either Tat is simply so radical he doesn't give a shit about the truth, or for him, snuff porn is his reality.
