>>102222975With all respect anon, you aren't proving your assertion that the stereotype is true based on anything but personal anecdote.
>But the "racists are rednecks and neckbeards" stereotype isn't exactly without a grain of truth either, in my experience.I mean, right here you're saying that your proof is personal experience. You can provide links between racial bias and intellect or IQ. But you haven't provided any proof to the assertion that there's a link between racial bias and race of the person holding the bias.
Which makes the assertion
And here:
>>102224216>In the same way, republicans are richer than average when you look at individual incomes. But when you count repub states vs dem states, repub states are poorer.You are linking red and blue states with income and wealth distribution which is something you can show data for (I assume you have it.)
But you haven't shown a link between red states vs blue states and racial bias. Not that any such bias could be quantified and defined easily that wouldn't be subject to a political bias in and of itself. More to the point:
You aren't saying that other people and races can or can't be racist. You're skirting the issue of how many people of any given particular race are likely to have those racist views an opinions or outright saying the stereotype is true of white people without any evidence to support that claim.
If you want to say that racist and bigoted views correlate with intellect, I don't think I'd find that contentious. If you want to say that race correlates with racist and bigoted views, that's not something you've proven with any kind of evidence; an anecdote simply not measuring up to any kind of scrutiny as evidence.
