>>102100136You have made some seriously bad argument against eugenics. They don't make any sense. Most eugenic arguments are fucking dumb, especially since there are retards who actually think Nazi Germany was engaging in eugenics (it was not, couldn't even successfully push the program that the US was doing), and even the USA "eugenics" program was a complete failure that accomplished none of its intended goals (wow, you sterilized a handful of people who were never gonna breed anyway). If you're gonna be against eugenics at least cite nations that actually did it, like Singapore. Was pretty successful and I would say humane given the consequences.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_planning_in_SingaporeIncluding the idea that removing a genetic bone condition is a bad idea. Huh? Its what happens when you believe in the pseudoscience that genes aren't real, or that human behavior, personality and cognitive ability aren't influenced by your genes. You don't even need to sterilize them, nor is it even necessary, most people with bad genetic conditions rarely if ever reproduce, so their genes get removed anyway. The problem is when those genes are recessive and have carriers, and people can and should be able to have children without carrying those genes.
The only good thing is that nothing can stop free market artificial selection. Desirable traits will be determined by the market and people will gladly get involved into it, because why wouldn't humans want to control their genomes? Why let everything happen on a roll of a die. Don't get why people think "eugenics" is bad, but "dysgenics" is okay.
