>>102033699That's just pilpul.
If I say, "Men are taller than women", that's a stereotype. Is it true? Of course, only a fucking retard would say otherwise. Does it mean every man is taller than every woman? Of course not, only a fucking retard would think that. Is it still a valid and useful observation? Of course, only a retard would deny that.
And what does "finding a way to isolate worse cases" even mean? Behaviour isn't societal, it's genetic, pretty much every new piece of evidence we get points to that, and every bit of old evidence does too if you don't willfully blind yourself to it. Successful people have more testosterone, violent people have alleles that predispose them to violence. Hell, empirical evidence shows that you can, and people do, recognise criminals just because they look like criminals.
Your ideology isn't based on evidence or reasoning is it, it's based on what you think should be true, or what you want to be true, or what people have told you your standards should be. I'll stick to reason over consensus and shame based enforcement.
https://splinternews.com/you-can-tell-a-criminal-from-his-facial-features-a-com-1793863907Here's a paper on it if you're interested. The guesswork was done by a program, not a person, so it's immune to spin.
It's funny how people most like to call evolution deniers backwards retards are the first to deny genetics when they say something they don't want to hear. Namely that we are all the sum of our parts, no more, no less.
