>>101112461See the MJ's case again, kids which names were never known, still, that didn;t stop the authorities to bring Michael to court
>>101112479>Already proved false. they were famous a long time ago before speaking up, meaning getting fame is not the reason they dshut up.Post the cases
>Otherwise, they would have spoken as soon as they were famous.Not true, since, in the case of Weinstein, a single role doesn't get you automatic fame, not to mention that Weinstein could have cut her career if they talked, they feared for their careers, not their values, if that was the case they would have leave in the audition, they spoke when they got roles outsde the Weinstein Comapny, which is the major prove of hypocresy
>Not acting is simply the result of being threatened.Yeah, their CAREERS were threatened
>ALWAYS folow your passion, don't let other put you down.Sorry, libshit, that's not how life works
See:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CVEuPmVAb8o>They did. they did complain several time, with LasseterThey complained with who? Friends of the company? If that's the case, then little to no help can be done, there's not a reason for authorities to not come up
>You can ALWAYS complain about shitty attitude, no matter what.Yes, at the time, not 4-5., or almost 10 years later.
>Also, they didn't put their ego before, they were threatened and or persuaded that they were the bad one for trying to report.>"Let him touch you ass! normal as it gets!"Very logical. Not to mention that, again, they could have quitted
>ou mean you want me to name all the bosses who do their job right?No, but some examples wouldn't be bad
>WRONG; when someone is harassed, it ALWAYS the abuser who take the dignity. NEVER the victim.If the victim is silent for years just to keep their job in the industry, he or she is the real dinity taker, simple as
>who blame the victim when the abuser is 100% wrongStaying silent just for keeping the job is being as bad as the abuser (2/2)
