>>100863907>she's better than Evans, Hemsworth and Pratt in terms of acting but you don't see anyone bitching about them.Because they look the part.
She doesn't.
And I've only seen this bitch in one action film. Kong: Skull Island. And she was flat and boring the entire film. Also her acting was dull and uninspired. It felt amateurish.
She's fine in down to reality drama films, but she's garbage in action and comedy roles.
You seem to be putting too much stock in a fucking Oscar.
Especially since not every actor has great range. She can be great in one type of role, but absolute trash in another.
There's a reason why you don't see Dave Chapelle doing serious dramatic roles, why Al Paccino showing up in a comedy film is now classified as a natural disaster, and why they get Morgan Freeman to narrate shit instead of Arnold Schwarzenegger.
An Oscar is not some magical relic that signifies you as God's gift to the arts capable of doing everything. It means you did really good "This one time. At this one specific sub group of this thing", and even that is all decided by a group of upper crust snobs who are so disconnected from audiences that they still think drive throughs are the most popular means of getting films to the masses.
Larson sucks at action and she's not funny enough nor does she have a good enough delivery for the mandatory Marvel quips, which are already an uphill battle for how overplayed they are.
The fact that she has the body of a teenage boy whose dad has been sneaking hormone pills into his meals for the last six months is the icing on the bad casting cake.
