>>100829383>Actually i’ve made multiple pointsUnless if saying the word "faggot" a million times now is considered a point, you've made none whatsoever.
>You seem to have this fascination with primates anonWith this logic, you seem to have a fascination with gay men. Perhaps a closeted homosexual?
>Actually you’re the one whose been doing most of the dictating hereThe "no u" post once again.
I'm not the one making claims that women are gay for liking effeminate men.
>This is also something only you’ve done.A yet another "no u", just cut short without filler projected accusations.
>It’s not phobia... blind not to call you outReferring to homosexuals with derogatory terms is a phobia indeed, anon. A phobia carried around by closeted ignoramuses like yourself nonetheless.
And call me out on what? That girls liking effeminate men isn't gay? Silly mental gymnastics from a silly insecure incel.
>Yet you have failed to prove how it is actually false thoughI have, but you refuse to read it. You'd rather keep going around in circles that acknowledging maybe, just maybe, you've been a close-minded dumbass.
>Maybe it’s not that i’m trollingI specifically said 'act', which means that I'm calling you out on any potential excuse that you were pretending to be a contradictory troll to pwn da libs.
>you’re genuinely that bad at defend your sideThat would've been a genuine claim if you actually made any points that debate my sides, but instead, you're running around with literal nonsensical ramblings.
>>100829497>How? Where is the contradiction?What? You can't see any contradiction in "girls liking effeminate men are gay"?
>No it doesn't it represents his ownIt does. People who think like him are the same type of people who say liking tomboy girls isn't gay, and while it is true, they don't hold the same fucking line of common sense to girls liking effeminate guys.
