>>100720827Guy, this is the exact same rhetoric used against the piracy of every other media. Which is to say, heavily flawed.
Piracy is inevitable. There will always be subset of people that would rather just wait to get it for free and a subset of people willing to indulge them.
The likelihood of the former ever buying it in the first place if it is never made available to them for free is extremely low, and thus arguably negligible no matter the scale or viewership of the content.
Not only that, but if someone of that group WERE to drop money for it, do you think they're more likely to share it due to mutual desires or keep it to themselves like the regular consumers?
Were they to stop producing pornography due to this, it would favor no one but their own ego as there would still be someone willing to pay for it. That's called group punishment, which is far more shortsighted than the immoral attitude of pirates.
It can't be accounted for. I suggest you learn to deal with it.
>>100720878>comparing porn to endangered speciesworse than /v/ tier food analogies
