>>100306336>a watered-down version of his SatAM selfNot even slightly. He never fucks up as hard as in SatAM in the comics and actually gets some characterization and slight development early on.
>until the comic hit its 40sStrike two, his best story is in issue 23. DeCesare liked characterizing him as a goofball fuckup who did okay but not great while Gallagher made him a less annoying version of SatAM Antoine who occasionally doesn't fuck up. The 40s were absolutely horrid and Antoine pretty much goes out of focus there anyway, aside from a cringe-inducing "romance" scene by Penders.
>with issue 41 being his absolute lowestAn issue he wasn't even in. You're thinking of 40, where he was *almost* as bad as SatAM Antoine but was played as effective comic relief and was immediately reprimanded for his bullshit.
Strike three, you don't know what you're talking about.
