>>941720051. Obviously different poster
2. Don't worry, women follow their own pre-programmed code. The specific facets get a lot more intricate than men, but the core is simpler: security of needs (emotional and physical) and security of relationships.
Ever had your gal ask you "would you still love me if I..." for like 3 hours straight? Security of relationships.
Ever had her get mad because you told her how to solve her problems rather than just shutting up and listening thoroughly, then maybe having a suggestion or two at the end? She does feel you're listening which means you don't care. Security of relationships.
Why is using a coupon on a date a turnoff instead of showing he's a shrewd businessman capable of supporting her comfortably? Less sacrifice is made, ergo less willing to go the extra mile for you. Security of relationships.
Speaking of, why do women like rich men? They can provide for you. Security of physical needs.
Why do women like strong men? They can protect you. Security of physical needs.
Why do women like sensitive men who take regular actions to make them feel secure in their relationship? Security of emotional needs.
Some other woman in the office is dressing sluttier and getting the attention of all the men in the office? Lessens your chance of getting one of those men you wanted, to fulfill your romantic and sexual needs. Better get super catty, spread rumors, and verbally attack her til she leaves or everyone is turned against her.
This is also why women fights get more brutal.
For men 9/10 it's just about establishing who's the manlier man, which is obviously only decidable through athletic competition preferably combat, because the aforementioned bad assumptions. Once that's settled, everything is fine, unless the loser keeps pushing for a rematch.
For women, it's treated as a fight for survival. She's a threat to your secure existance and must be permenantly eliminated by any means available.
Men go for a win. Women go for blood.
