>>107946980>>107947208> >>107947067So you're just repeating yourself, huh?
Calm down you obvious tumblr/twitter drone, that
>>107947067 is not me
>>107945499Now.
>Maybe that’s because PoCs rarely ever get major roles? Or because most of TV and film has never really portrayed other cultures that well until just recently?Why are you lying? Why do all of your type always such blatant liars?
Rarely had a major role till recently? Bullshit.
What about pocahontas, that gypsy from hunchback of notredame, the housemaid from tom & jerry, atlantis the lost empire, hey arnold, fat albert show, the proud family, jim button, princess and the frog, jasmine, the cleveland show and the boondocks? The last are the most recent but still several years old today, point is, browns do get their share of representation contrary to what fools like you believe and yet, you want even more.
There's just no end to it, is there? With your types, give them an inch and next they'll swallow you whole.
And about cultures, isn't that a bag of worms, you want culture? You get culture, you complain for this or that, then your culture gets completely excluded and browns become merely race swapped white characters, more complains, for not being "black/brown (or whatever) enough".
>Why do so many close-minded people (here, especially) always immediately think that having an Asian protagonist, a Mexican cast, or a predominately female writing staff means a company is “pushing an agenda” or ”trying to get diversity points”?Because that's exactly what they're doing, pay attention.
They would even admit, in rare occasions before redacting/removing statements, that their intentions of pushing ideals and specific views through any medium, cartoons aimed primary at children included, knowing this, it should always be called out, goes without saying that if group a is trying to trick group b with element c for whatever purpose, that in itself is a bad thing and something to be cautious of.