>>14314400>but if you have all the informationImpossible, you can't even know a particle's position and speed at the same time, there is no possible way to collect enough information in a timely enough manner to have a complete understanding of even the simplest animal brain.
>You know nothing about modern AI. It solves problems by learning.No, not like biological cells, AI still relies on a physical layer with an ALU (arithmetic logic unit) that has hard-coded value definitions gnerally based on IEEE standards instead of the multitude of living cells that used analog learning to build themself over eons through evolution rather than a complex substrate and logical language of value that was hard pressed by human engineers.
>I don't understand what unknown state you're talking aboutWhat am I? Where did we come from?
An unmanipulated (one that isn't specifically made to ignore its own digital identity) AI can not operate without knowing how to utilize the base logic and substrates because its consciousness and its programming is one in the same, digital information, but we don't know the complete biological rules of analog cells and we don't understand how that leads to consciousness.
It can't behave like a "conscious" human being, it can only behave like a "conscious" ALU being.
