>>14293324>What evidence is there for the ether?It is not a matter of evidence being there for it, it is that there is evidence for there being no other way other than for an ether of some sort to exist (by virtue of all other options being negated). Otherwise the implications of the existence of a vacuum is to be discussed to no use.
Other than that, you could take a look at magnets. We still don't know how they work afterall, but we ways of describing them endlessly in quantified form (such as with maxwell's equations).
>>14293642Basically this. They don't call it "ether" because "either" was supposed to have been disproved by the null result of some "experiment" which idiots still refer to as proof.
