>>13552226I don't typically think of AI much at all, and I don't have any of the utopian fantasies you're describing. Whether the subject is cringe or not I'm just curious about the subject is all. I'm not here to measure egos or call things onions, which is apparently the reason you browse /sci/.
>>13552238Interesting idea. I've been led to understand PTSD is a result of a physical adrenal response in the brain, and I'm unsure how that would translate digitally. Maybe none of our human mental disorders would have AI analogs, I don't know.
The loneliness angle I don't follow. It couldn't be that hard to provide the necessary attention, or belonging, or esteem or whatever the machine needs, if it even has those needs. Sounds like things that would stem from the ego, if a learning AI would even has an ego.