>>13546616because God is a byproduct of human language. it's misusing the mathematical language (which was created to represent reality) to justify the existence of an abstraction created by a faulty language which is not scientific.
I remembered that my physics professor could demonstrate the existance of every fantastic character by playing with the mathematical and human social language.
and remaining in the realm of social human language, a perfect being which has all the positive properties (whatever they are) should be also autoevident. but it's not, god is a byproduct of the language which become a very useful social meme to justify power structures and reduce stress.
that said, you can argue that a spinozian "god" could indeed be demonstrated mathematically, but it has nothing to do with the theistic god.
