>>11562690I think they are making this WAY harder than it needs to be and they don't have a simulation.
I genuinely do not think Optimum Theory can be improved upon at a fundamental level. The fundamental idea that the Universe is an infinite field with a "real-number value" at each point, interacting locally while conservativing their sum value seems fundamental. Would love to be proven wrong, but I'm just not seeing it. Important to understand that my theory came first, and then when I fed it into the computer I could see with my own eyes the 4 forces emerge from 1 equation... this is why I am such a believer... it was like something magical. I had my jaw open for weeks afterward. All I did was take the most established ideas in physics: locality, conservation, simultaneity, symmetry, 4 dimentions... really really basic stuff... I wanted to make some kind of model for a class (I am a teacher), and I thought, "if this is all true then I should be able to simulate it... And I did!!! It could not be simpler... How could it be any simpler?? It almost seems too simple, but Darwinian evolution is also exraordinarily simple in hindsight...
That said, the simulation can be improved and expanded, but I just don't know how the fundamental idea can be improved...
Anyway, I have no idea why this has fallen on me. I am a total loser and fk up in so many ways... But I remind myself that, fundamentally, what I have done is not that impressive in a world where amazing things happen every day. Elon Musk is landing rockets! I'm just some guy who believed what the scientists were saying, fed that all into a computer while they were still using blackboards and son-of-a-btch it actually worked!!!!!!
