>>10564247Not quite. It models actual waves. There are absolutely no such waves here. You can see slight wave like behavior but they average together instead of cancelling out
>>10564259Double slit has not been replicated as the "waves" from this diffusion are not really waves like those on water or gravity or anything that you think of when thinking of waves.
>>10564236No, no advection occurs. If anyone claims it does, ask them to actually explain it. Its diffusion via 3x3 box blur with the corners weighted very low
>>10564162These are just labels
Guess what, if you measure what the lowest negative number is, and add that as an offset in visualization, you'll have the exact same system, exact same dynamics, but with no negative numbers. There is no contraction or expansion, both the negative and positives behave exactly the same. In fact it has nothing to do with positive or negative, only relation to what surrounds it. So zero surrounded by 10 is exactly the same as -5 surrounded by 5, or -200 surrounded by -190, or 320 surrounded by 330. All exactly the same behavior wise.
>>10564027But no, literally any model of anything that has any complexity at all will model entropy.
Its just a 3x3 box blur
Its
Just
A
3x3
Box
Blur
That said Im still working on it because there still are a lot of interesting processes going on with a 3x3 box blur at large scales with added noise. Im just not pretending this has anything at all to do with physics though
