WTF is this. Lol this isn't a scientific paper.
And by the way it does assume infinite growth. They don't present any case for their model other than a volume association with temperature not actually given with any physical explanation. they are comparing rates between different charts over a smal of time and called it good.
His also involves some quack science between the ratio between fossil fuel Reserves and a theoretical equilibrium with the atmosphere which was later proven to be untrue as of reservoirs are much bigger than originally estimated.
The data is straight copied from NOAA with the exxon advisors doing any verification on their own, so this becomes quite circular as referencing material as NOAA changed their model from this as one of their many models changes.
yep as they go through this all this references other material not included in the memo. There is no physical explanation for the connection between Rising temperature and CO2 presented in any sort of model supported by experiment or physics.
Have you actually read this or did you just take the graphs that seem like it supported your stance?
If you post the references I can break down the physics for you but this memo includes no physics.