>>12302756>Making the implication that there's only one species of it and that it's only adapted to one type of temperature
No, your made up assumptions isn't an implication of what they wrote. You're grasping at straws because you didn't even read what you cited. >Funny how you ignored this part. Disingenuous much?
This is really rich. I didn't ignore it. The sentence directly after what you quoted explains that this is not the major effect of warmer temperatures:>In controlled environment studies, warm temperatures increased the rate of phenological development; however, there was no effect on leaf area or vegetative biomass compared to normal temperatures. The major impact of warmer temperatures was during the reproductive stage of development
The one selectively quoting and being disingenuous is you. Unfortunately, you're not very good at it.