>>5980275>>5980292Perfect example of effeminate low iq response
Instead of going against what's been said; it's easier to attack the one saying it to stop their cognitive dissonance from triggering
Also implying they know me or assuming who i am to magically validate what they believe to be witty retorts while also playing the social game on an anonymous image board.
They quite literally couldn't stop for a moment and ask themselves what they're about to post, because they were already anticipating the dopamine of receiving a response.
Matter of fact, they do not care about any response, nor do they actually read them, nor does it actually matter if they do; they will continue going back and forth as long as they get their dopamine or can "win" whatever it is posted about; Ultimately not talking or discussing for the sake of attaining knowledge or insight, but merely for the narcissistic desire of feeling superior to an anonymous user over the internet and if they can't win, they're just going to throw insult at you hoping you get offended and demoralized and trying to "no u", only to end with "i was just pretending to be retarded and you're trolling me! GOTCHA!"
These type of short, pretentious, passive aggresive effeminate posts are the essence of a soijack, but no soijack in existence could ever capture the amount of faggotry these two Anons emanate from their written words alone.
Worst of all, they will never post their work, because they're here for the free shit and to socialize.
>>5980258Did you even read that? Because it say the exact same thing i say, just with extra autism and variables.
My point still only is that it's harder for high test males to focus on a task while being subjected to arousal, because nature.
A shallow self reported study with saliva samples around 70 people barely scratches any kind of surface.
