>>5977129I did indeed didn't make my point clear enough(it fits the western world after all), with my only excuse being getting pretty sick and probably not really in the best state of mind.
I'm simply allergic to anything having too much power because it's so easy to abuse it. My country used to be controlled by communists. Standing in line for basic stuff was pretty common and anti-soviet opinions brutally repressed because the government wanted to force things to fit their agenda. I cannot help, but notice that under standard of "fairness and equality" the dishonest agents are trying to take control of what people are allowed to think once again. It doesn't matter what they're preaching because in the end either they're trying to take away freedom of speech or freedom of entrepreneurship, which ends up limiting the other because they're connected as both are means of using power.
I would say that the difference between communism and corporatism is the way on how they deal with enemies - communism tries to directly smash the opponents while corporatism attempts to use subtlety first and play the good guy, so that even if there is a cliche of enemies, they end up not being able to do much due to lack of support.
In communism these soviets films had to be subtle to avoid getting directors in the trouble. In "capitalism" the corporations take the "conspiracy theory" and turn it into ridiculous fiction film (count the amount of movies with corporation being the antagonist or futuristic dystopian settings) to either have viewers put this concept into fantasy category or feel like their opinions has been heard, so they can sit back do other stuff because "their job is done".
That's my simple-minded opinion, tho.
