>>5955134>>5955136>>5955137I'm
>>5954049. I wasn't advertising Loomis specifically, simply quoting common critics of it, as a joke, and tying those critics to common irrational behavior among gay people, from whom such critics sometimes occur.
Kind reminder that at some point in history, repulsion for incest was qualified as a repressed desire (Freud). Nowadays, people have woken up and realize that yeah, that's a bit extreme. But it's the same structural argument.
The world isn't separated in pro-gay/anti-gay, there are rational, liberal, neutral people in between.
If you're gay and being irrational, we do have the right to point it out, and that doesn't make us anti-gay. If you're anti-gay and being irrational, we do have the right to point it out, and that doesn't make us pro-gay.
