>>5938463>you have no idea how many different creative skills But I do know bad art when I see it
>No, paying rent and living expenses is more important Everyone has to pay rent, are you implying Team Cherry are the only devs ever to have rent
>they allow themselves to be treated like garbageThey're independent, they're their own bosses, and they decided to go with an intentionally low effort art style
>They really aren’t doing it for the moneyI mean they are charging money for it so they are literally doing it for the money
>only a small fraction of indie games actually succeed in making a profitBut those that do manage to do it with less effort than what the standard for games used to be, everyone wants to play the lottery because the barrier for entry is so low
>Subjective. You don't provide a bare minimum metric It's self evident, other devs with worse conditions managed to create better looking games that play as well or better, Team Cherry was aware of them yet they decided to go with a lower ambition option
>Art has already been solvedlmao
>Who the fuck caresPeople who care about games and art? Why should I give a fuck about your contribution if you don't give a fuck yourself, stop wasting my time
>shouldn’t be called “lazy” just because some aspects of their creation aren’t up to par against other critically appraised gamesBut that's literally what's happening, they're being critically praised as much as other devs despite being much lazier than them
>you called the entire dev team “lazy”Only because I don't know who was in charge of the art
>You don't just get to criticize their visual aspectsIn fact I do
>That doesn’t mean other artists should be called lazy or unpassionate for not surpassing the greatsIt literally means just that
Not sure why you're so obsessed with defending and justifying laziness and complacency unless you're a member of Team Cherry yourself or a zoomer who aligned his identity with their game for some reason
