>>5932173I'd like to use this poor sod as an example of leftoid/libtard cultural domination and subsequent religious type of rabid reaction at new and better(right wing) ideas filtering into the mainstream discourse. banski and similar artists are broadcast by the mainstream because they are a safe form of critique as it does not inherently hurts the status quo. whenever you actually harm the status quo ie by being racist(its foundational myths being WW2 and the american civil rights movement) you immediately cause a programmed response like this one. check this out.
>The rule of art and comedy is to punch/strike up, not down. this is a rule laid out by 'official' cultural institutions(tv, universities, hollywood) when it was aired out that they are in fact the man in charge and not the underdog as shitlibs and leftoids have thought of themselves since the 19th century.
>There's no reason to attack minorities and those in worse state than you. this is of course the resulting diminishing of agency of 'darkies' necessary for libs and leftards who wish to use them as bludgeoning tools against you(as they did during civil rights movement)
>Who would what their art to represent bullying and exclusion?thus if you wish to harm the status quo, you are a bad person.
>Of course there's propaganda art and racist comics but very few artists want to tarnish their name or artist persona with them.and so anything that harms the status quo can be safely dismissed as 'outgroup' thought and validating such ideas means that you are low status.
this is the kind of thing that you have to keep in mind if you wish to create real and worth samizdat(aka not bansky) otherwise you are merely another tool for the system to reinforce itself. Godspeed and good luck in your future endeavours, anon.
