>>5923869What books do you recommend where I wouldn't be wasting my time? Loomis looks pretty good
>>5923870Thanks, this guy looks like he can actually draw
>>5923873Okay. But the point of those sausages is to create a visually pleasing and accurate image, which he failed at. So no, I would not say it's a good wolf. Mine may be amateur, but I already stated that I'm a beginner, and this drawabox guy made an online tutorial to teach others how to draw a wolf. You would think he'd at least try to visualize the canine anatomy before having the audacity to teach others. He doesn't even need to "study" it, just look at his own reference picture. What this tells me (as a beginner) is that even with all these exercises and constructions, he still can't draw and I shouldn't listen to him.
>>5923876>>5923877>>5923884Here are a few more quick sketches with no reference at all. Yes I know they have many problems but that wasn't my point, my point was that this guy shouldn't be an art teacher.
>>5923911Thanks
