>>5901090You have a lot of these features already, just what I thought would be good from reading the thread.
Simple upvote system should work fine.
>was this critique helpful? yes, no, neutral>they pick the top 3 critiquesprofessional/formal atmosphere
Others can approve critiques instead of just rewording it in another reply.
Some way to limit new accounts.
Don't encourage useless crits like, "it looks good!". Minimum character lengths.
Some prompts or templates to get people to critique various things.
Template/form when posting critique to state the purpose of the piece, what they were studying, why they used certain materials. Don't let people use excused like posting random in school doodles.
Some ideas from other sites you could use:
Proko forums
>has a nice guide on how to give/recieve crit>upload multiple images in one post>chain/branch repliesQuora
>Name, Credentials MFA Masters of Fine Arts, Savannah College of Art and Design
Updated 1 year ago · Author has 2.5K answers and 7.4M answer views
Stackoverflow
>bounties to reward answers, >asker picks best answer, answerer gets rewarded., stickied to top of replies.>gold, silver, bronze badges for top 3 answers>job page where people look for work/offer jobs>since a potential employer may see your posts, people act professionallyebay
>Feedback ratings >positive, neutral, negative interactions>overall percentage ratingArtStation
>pro badge/industry statusIMDB
>credits of professional work and in what role 
