>>5881160>opens wikipedia page that your jpeg copied and pasted from>reads english words"Scarr & Weinberg (1976) interpreted the results from age 7 suggesting that racial group differences in IQ are inconclusive because of confounding in the study...
>what about age 17?"...they interpreted their results as still supporting the original conclusions."
>So the study was meaningless... >wait hold on..."Both Levin[8] and Lynn[9] argued that... the mean IQ scores and school achievement of each group reflected their degree of African ancestry."
>ok, I guess it meant som->wait hold on..."Waldman, Weinberg, and Scarr[10] responded... "...results from the Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study provide little or no conclusive evidence for genetic influences underlying racial differences in intelligence and achievement, ""
>nvm it's meaningless"In a 1998 article, Scarr wrote, "...The results of the transracial adoption study can be used to support either a genetic difference hypothesis or an environmental difference one (because the children have visible African ancestry). We should have been agnostic on the conclusions . . .""
>Still meaningless>Next sentence:"Later opinions supported Scarr's reassessment."
>Confirmed meaningless"Loehlin (2000) reiterates the confounding problems of the study and notes that both genetic and environmental interpretations are possible."
>Extra confirmed meaningless"A paper from Drew Thomas (2016), which reanalyzed these adoptions studies, found that once corrected for attrition in the low IQ white adoptees and once corrected for the Flynn effect, since none of the Asian adoptee studies had control groups, mixed and white adoptees scored the same, and black adoptees scored a little lower with a gap of 2.5 points, which can be explained by their pre-adoption characteristics."
>Meaningless fake-news study jpeg confirmed.See picrel
