>>5870552Myers-Briggs is just a personality inventory m8. Nobody is acting like it’s some infallible shit.
And of ways to realistically sort and define the differences between personality, it’s not necessarily too shabby. It’s pretty reliably consistent no matter which way you take it. I’ve always gotten -NTP whether it was when I took the full test in class or took the abridged internet tests. If it was random astrology shit it’d be much less consistent.
There could be a whole lot more variables and better questions and stuff but it’s generally not too bad as an exercise for bozos to think about who they are. Plus it makes it easier for consumers to sort themselves into easily marketed-to psychographic groups. And daddy loves that.
Do you just refuse to accept that people can be sorted by diagnostic criteria entirely? Everyone is just an undefinable beautiful and unique snowflake?
How would you build a personality inventory test differently?
