>>5832624That thread and post were less than 1 month ago Dec 8 2021
https://archive.wakarimasen.moe/ic/thread/5774704/ which is why it's fresh in my memory. I did remember the original contention but to me the argument "is it near accurate" vs "is it **95%** accurate" was splitting hairs so I didn't at first go into that, thinking my explanation of how I think it's accurate would be enough.
I never said I reread anything only that I had to guess what you meant because of how you wrote it and I responded to each of the most likely interpretations.
But all I care about is clarifying my point of view on the drawing so I'll say it one last time as simply as I can.
Accuracy of Anon's Drawing:
Copying the drafting ability - 95%? No.
Copying the aesthetics of the style - 95%? Sure, or maybe 90%. Close enough in my opinion to fall in the range of high accuracy. Definitely recognizable without being too skewed by lack of drafting ability.
That's the simplest way I can put it.
You shouldn't take it personally that I disagree with your assessment of how accurate it is and believe I'm on some kind of vendetta to defend that random anon's drawings. A lot of anons look for milestones to help them know when they should switch tactics to progress and I think that anon's work is a fine example of a level of ability where someone should start moving away from copying and I want to point that out for others too.
