>>5828837It's copyright infringement. Don't let the rest of the thread trick you, artists regularly get C&D'd for r34. The space is so crowded that you could very easily go untouched for 10 or 20 years without lawyers having the time to get around to you though.
You could be sued in civil court but it's unlikely it would come to before the C&D. I also imagine that you could circumvent C&Ds by just switching accounts regularly since knowing your actual identity would require a subpoena or something and getting that shit costs too much to do it at scale, but I wouldn't advise it.
>>5829037I'm curious if you know of any artists that you think are prime offenders in drawing isabelle incorrectly? Only issue I usually see is people drawing her notably thinner/taller than she actually is or giving her massive honkers.
>>5829213Yes, we're banking on corps not caring. Going "full nintendo" really isn't an option because C&Ds or lawsuits at that scale are too difficult. The nintendo youtube thing only worked because nintendo threatened youtube itself.
The reality though is that the ezpz way to circumvent the whole thing would just be people changing their work slightly and claiming parody. There was the infamous case of nintendo trying to sue a mario porn parody in the 90s and losing the case because it was parody and thus they resorted to buying the rights to the film so they could bury it. So just make some characters look slightly different, add a porn parody disclaimer, and then you're immune so long as you have enough money for a lawyer.
>>5829215Any works you make of their characters, regardless of it's commercial nature, is copyright infringement unless you have an explicit license to make said works. The commission thing wouldn't work because they can just subpoena the communication records.
>>5829270The lack of original content is the direct responsibility of consumers, not artists. Artists have no control over consumers buying derivative works over originals.
