>>5826197It's hard to critique this piece solely on it's composition specially if the OP reads "What is she trying to say here?".
From what I gather this thread is tailored to create controversy just like when it gets posted on /pol/, in my opinion this is nothing but a troll thread and OP should get a 3-day for baiting people into political discussion about a mentally ill woman and her life choices and whether if you consider them acceptable or not on the context of modern day degeneracy of women in general. Thus being said from what I understand this is some sort of comic that appeal to a niche group of single women and reminds me of those doll dressing games little girls play, those doll TV shows and dolls in general really (Sorry if I can't reference them correctly I'm ignorant about it).
Now, knowing this is a comic strip I think I like how much detail there is on these characters even when some of the features on them are unrealistic you always should look at this work as a comic and judge it as such. I think the rendering is fairly mediocre, the poses always seem to be extremely stiff with this artist and she seems to be unable to draw anything more dynamic. I don't like that this person recicles poses and characters (both characters are exactly the same from down the head) and the watermark infuriates me like you wouldn't believe, I hate watermarkfaggots in general but again I understand this is a comic strip and this stuff get's reposted a lot.
Overall if for one second you're able to see past the bullshit I don't think it's bad specially as people in this site makes it to be, even when this "doll/comic" style isn't my cup of tea I can certainly see some type of effort being made and skill being applied to produce these comics specially if you compare it to StoneToss who is a complete beginnery and hell, if you want to get into it I don't think this artist is the biggest mentally ill person out there when you compare her to a Chris-Chan or Shadmen.
