>>5818831you or whoever made the post wasnt insinuating that leftists were merely "perpetuating" the practice.
>only one who's into tribalism is youif the entire point of my post is that censorship and tribalism are bad then its pretty retarded to call me tribalist because i pointed out someone elses tribalism.
>you don't offer any real solution neither you or the person who made that post offered solutions. my goal was to tell others to stop being retarded, which doesnt not obligate me (nor make me capable of) solving whatever theyre sperging out over.
>reprimanding against the ones who are CURRENTLY still continuing the practicewhat youre asking me to do is virtue signal. i made two posts saying censorship is bad. if you want me to amend those posts to call out people that the first anon already reprimanded then youre asking me to virtue signal to you to prove that im not playing favorites, which is again very telling.
>why would I willfully make a false opinion and preach it like it's a gospel?you are again to occupied with being correct so i again have to spell out my point.
you are so utterly preoccupied with being technically "correct" on each point that rather than read my post, discerning its meaning in totality, and then responding to the whole of it you instead scan my post line by line with complete disregard to its context.
youre essentially doing the text equivalent of mocking an animated film for having smear frames with complete disregard to the fact that the smear frames are required to create the illusion of motion, and as someone on an art board i hope you can understand how dumb that would be. though im sure the metaphor will be completely lost on you because you likely dont even draw.
