not that anon but
>>5812139>fags like you are only critiquing his work to feel better yourself and your brokeness.fags like them use critique as an actual weapon.
And they can't even critique, they just hurl words at you which basically boil down to
>"it's bad because i don't like it">"It's bad because it isn't like i think it should be">"it's bad because i don't like you">"It's NOT BAD because other people like it">"it's good because i like it">"it's good because i like the artist">"it's good because it appeals to me">"It's good because people like you dislike it"and they can't stay objective on any matter whatsoever.
They don't even attempt to reason, because they do not care about the art or growing as an artist, they only care about feeling good about themselves and the dopamine they get.
BUT
>>5812140although i'm pretty sure this is just a joke
>"critique became invalid the second [Anon] monetized his work"but there are fags who unironically think like this.
And it's the same kind of retardation that leads to faggots using crits as a weapon, since any sort of slight negative criticism turns into shit flinging either by the artist or by their fans/consumers
>"ur just jelly he earns more than u haha lol u suck stop saying bad things about things i like" This makes any kind of actual discussion impossible, you discourage actual people who care about giving actual feedback to participate and you enable retards to shit on everything out of spite.
Even then, you'll see fags spend hours trying to outright negate and invalidate anything bad said about a thing, but they won't spend any of that time actually trying to make an argument,
>Firez always draws the same face.Is a valid criticism. Whether you're offended by it or not, rests entirely upon you.
And this shithole won't magically shape reality or completely annihilate an artist out of existence when they say bad words about a work.
tldr; gtfo my board, all of you.
