>>5798564NFTs are unethical because they potentially require far greater excess power to perform a superfluous function which is not required for transactions to take place.
They are unethical because the certificate of ownership does not truthfully represent any kind of ownership over the given subject of said certificate in any true legal or practical definition of the term ownership.
They are unethical because the claim of them being decentralized is untrue since the subject of the nft is not actually contained within the NFT, thus requiring a secondary CENTRALIZED being to deliver you the subject of the NFT in some kind of other capacity.
I do not care if not every type of blockchain requires more power, because exceptions to the average do not change the average. If most nfts and the blockchain technology they used did not require much power at all then I would rescind this point, but since this is untrue of the average then the point remains.
I do not care that some NFTs may theoretically represent contracts of ownership. This property is not inherently true of the average or of all NFTs and thus the point remains.
I do not care that some blockchain technology may be theoretically possible of containing the entire data of an image, piece of text, video, or other such digital content. These theoretical capabilities are not true of the average or of all NFTs and thus the point remains.
Suck my fucking dick.
