>>5758100>I can imagine it but I can't see itthat IS seeing it, you don't have aphantasia
i swear every supposed aphantasiac sounds like they just don't know what it means to imagine something
>>5758207>But people on /ic/ describe visual memory way differentbut they don't mean it the way you're interpreting it, this is semantics
everything about aphantasia is just semantics
if you can imagine something, even if its low in detail, you don't have aphantasia
to imagine is not to hallucinate
you people make my fucking brain melt jesus christ