>>5755057>But you're ignoring everythingI replied to the anons that said that Dave's advice was useless.
I don't understand why you're shifting the focus of the discussion claiming that we are ignoring things or that we don't know what he said while the post was really simple.
>I asked Dave Rapoza about how to learn composition and he basically told me to look at a lot of art and realize that there are a few compositions that work, triangles, squares, etc. He also said to about tangents because they "create tension".Dave Rapoza uses graphical compositions to arrange characters in a nice way. There isn't a lot of storytelling in his composition, what I don't understand is why ask composition advice to him and then complain, when it's clear that what he does it's not what you want to do.
You should re-read Framed Ink. it's basically storyboarding for movies. The image in op compositionally is just a one-point perspective with the focus centered, lined with the vanishing point, it's one of the things Framed Ink explains. This one
>>5752987 is similar, the difference is that there is contrast between the high density of shapes of the ground vs. the simple sky, another thing that is explained in Framed Ink.
