>>5751524It seems to me that by definition, anons here are technically creating this so called "A.I. art" because this computer program requires references made by humans in order to do this search engine style image splicing.
Furthermore, it's obvious AI sucks at art because the same people that promote A.I. art would call these pieces shit if they were told it was created by humans.
Until A.I. becomes self-aware and actually creates original artwork not lifted from any pre-made search engine images this shit will remain unimpressive.
