>>5750170>objective=/=absolutism you fucking nigger. Also stop with the whataboutism.If it's objective, it's the truth no matter the point of view. How can it not be absolute you moron.
That's the point, that's why you can't reconciliate objectivity and art.
You do understand people don't have their own personal law of thermodynamics right ?
>blah blah blah applying the scientific method to art.How would you even approach that ?
What's the artistic "physical phenomena" that's gonna generate the same reaction for everyone ?
What's the scientific theory of aesthetic ?
>It's Neuroesthetics and it existsIt's barely accepted, vastly decried in the rest of the scientific community
>"There are several objections to researchers' attempts to reduce aesthetic experience to a set of physical or neurological laws. It is questionable whether the theories can capture the evocativeness or originality of individual works of art.">if something applies to the fundamentals of information and physical phenomena, then it also applies to artNope, the difference is the human factor. Cognition and lived experience is way too granular to even begin to form
a cohesive theory around it (see quote).
You want to supplant the terms objectivity/subjectivity ? Cool let's do that.
It's impossible to capture into laws that which relates to artistic expression.
We must accept that all standards in these fields are social constructs.
