>>5743530A sixth sense has nothing to do with that.
That's just practical knowledge you've developed, which is nothing of the supernatural.
Women appeal to emotions and feelings.
Men appeal to pure carnal desires.
Women's work has more details in it or their characters have very distinctive features, mostly facial features.
Men's work is rather "functional", to serve a purpose, so they don't usually bother much with going with too much into detail and their characters can look barebones, almost bland.
You can even tell on natural drawing styles, whether the artist is female or male, in how they draw their initial sketches.
But trying to figure it out just by that, can be deceiving.
Some males draw like women.
Some women draw like men.
If you take for example, jap artists who draw moeshit or colorful anime grill staring at viewer, you'd think they might be females, but they're just highly effeminate males.
If you see some of the work of the big name artists out there, mostly nsfw ones, they oddly come off as female through their works.
I don't want to drop names or it will summon fanboys and drama but it's the usual suspects: Plural, not singular.
The point i'm trying to make is; "female" work is more appealing to a broader audience than just big tits and asses.
The more you draw, the better you get, the more "female" your work (must) becomes, especially if you're trying to garner an audience.
Because drawing at higher levels and with more complexity; is a useless skill that does not aid survival and has no function except in those rare cases that you want to illustrate something specific for the sake of visual aid.
That's why more women go into the arts fields than men and even then, they're probably very passive and mostly fail to monetize their work on their own.
So, it is safe to assume that, what you think might be a female artist, is probably a really effeminated male or a male who knows what he's doing.
