>>6019925I'm a new anon, not
>>6012393.
As far as I'm concerned, sexuality as commonly understood nowadays has always been repressed by all religion in the past, China included. Buddhism for instance advise against sexual relations for their monks (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhism); I doubt Confucianism would favor free sexual relations while promoting strong familial bound.
I don't buy that atheist regimes really oppress sexuality. If you think about it, Americans get shocked by a titty escaping a bra, have very strict age restriction policies, but no problem in having this turning around everywhere
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hsm4poTWjMs . They are as hypocritical.
>the free sexuality is a fucking political tool of corporate control over the populationNot sure what you mean about corporate control, but yeah, I do believe it's definitely a political tool, aiming a controlling the population to some degree. It has become even more blatant with the recent hardcore trannification.
