The dome model is horseshit, we all know this, the main problem being the south and north celestial poles. The globe model is horseshit too, we all know this, since it's a mathematical model not based on empirical evidence of curvature obtained using the scientific method. The empirical evidence proves it is flat, sorry but that is the reality, don't fucking cry about it, we've all been mislead, now get over it, you're getting very boring now. Science moves on.

I have devised a new model based on an infinite, stationary plane in an attempt to explain the southern celestial pole(s). Pic related.

My theory posits that the "stars" are local (and infinite), and map to/create the earth's infinite electromagnetic field. They are not random balls of gases in fusion trillions upon trillions of miles away (snap out of it). Because the "stars" map to the electromagnetic field, their configurations (constellations) are not random, so the set of "southern" "stars" South America/Africa etc see will be the same "set" that Australia/New Zealand see, as they are equal opposite to the "northern" set of "stars".

The stars rotate by themselves, in different directions depending on their electromagnetic force. The behaviour of things that are attributed to the "Coriolis Force" like hurricanes rotating in different directions, are actually being caused by the rotation of the electromagnetic stars above (as well as things like the Foucault pendulum).

Because the "stars" are local, they are affected by perspective, just as everything else is. Objects above our eye level will be forced down towards the horizon, the higher and further away the object is, the sharper this "dip" towards the horizon is. Next picture will try to explain this a bit more.