>>9948767no. You're just a gullible popsci consumer with an extremely unsupported faith in the ramblings of those hiding behind the facade of science.
I would wager my life that most of the discoveries and assumptions claimed by scientists are completely false if for no greater purpose than selling snakeoil, cause I already know most of the big ones are just lies.
Science has only gotten to this point. Look around you. Virtually nothing which has the capacity to impact your life today, in any way whatsoever, relies on any scientific endeavor or theory proposed after 1930, with the largest "advances" in the recent 2 decades being explicitly based on trying to functionally recreate the brainlet imaginary delusions of science fiction authors. How the fuck do you think touchscreens became so popular, for example?
faggoty science fiction. The shit is unwieldly and a step backwards by all accounts, but it was in a futuristic sci fi movie so durrrrrrrrr guess we better do it!!
atomic clocks aren't real, providing no true evidence for time dilation or einstein's works.
light streak cameras aren't real, providing no true evidence for the speed of light having ever been measured much less by some retard from hundreds of years ago miscalculating jupiter's orbit.
Gene sequencing isn't real, providing no true evidence for the understanding of life, nor evidence CRISPR or DNA analysis is real.
The pharmaceutical industry does not solve real problems with medication, providing no true evidence that illness isn't caused by anything less than ideas in your head.
You're surrounded by a web of lies that earns large corporations a lot of money and demands you pay into it by threat of insulting your intelligence against a made-up status quo, or worse yet threatening your life with "or else" clauses.
But they're ultimately just empty threats, as empty as their theories and products.
