>>9516146Your explanation is incorrect--you said:
>All is much more accurate than some if all hipsters are annoying.and
>All hipsters are annoying, each and every one of them, not just one or two, all of them.But this is NOT why the syllogism is invalid, because (given that at least one hipster exists), All hipsters are annoying -> Some hipsters are annoying is a correct inference.
The mistake is assuming at least one hipster does in fact exist. Your reasoning is incorrect.
