>>9465156>>9465173There's no such thing as a single method that leads to the obtainment of knowledge about reality. Actual, relevant discoveries in science (think something that radically changes our understanding of reality, not the shit done by PhDs with fund money) are rarely made by following your stale "methods", but usually quite the contrary: by going against the dominant views.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Structure_of_Scientific_Revolutions#Basic_approachhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemological_anarchismOf course, given your evident and utter ignorance understanding of philosophy of science and your belief that what you're taught in elementary school is all there is to it (!!!), I don't believe either of you would've thought of this.
