>>9301892it's quite good, but some notes are important and lacking. in "A start" you don't need to read so much, skimming basic mathematics is more than enough if you had a high school education. I agree with calculus from stewart (supplement with online lectures from
ocw.mit.edu 18.01), and agree with one of either books of proof.
now, set theory is good to have, I wouldn't give "Set theory" by Jech to a novice because even though the beginning is reasonable, it has too much stuff to get lost in, and the language is terse and aimed at someone with experience. drop that one. the rest are great, not much to say.
even though it's close to the best list of this kind you can make, the usefulness of these lists as a whole is very limited. you should consult with your local mathfag before selecting a reading path, and constantly check with them to make informed decisions.
>>9302122it's shit, never post it again
>>9302171this one's worse though, even more stuff for the beginning when half is already too much, and it's only the beginning.
