>>7615890>My understanding of his argument is that given a finite set {a,b} exists because we can choose distinct things in the real world that are represented by a and b.Is it the year of our lord 0 A.D.? Are we still counting sheep with rocks and shit? What in the physical world correspondes to a Hilbert space? Nothing, yet we use that mathematics to describe nature at its smallest scales and now we have people sitting on the toilet with a fucking pocket computer shitposting wirelessly ITT while they actually take a shit THANKS to these infinite sets that cant be put into correspondence with autbergers favorite fucking finite set.
the autism has got to stop guys, go ahead and come up with whatever bullshit you want to do with 1 or 2 less axioms but to sit there and make videos denouncing Cauchy and Dedekind (like autberger fucking does) is just rediculous.
Usually when i make threads ill get all manner of algebraists and pde guys all come in and share great stuff but whenever autberger comes up its just nothing but shit, i really fucking hate that piece of shit
