>>11130300now think about the following: someone defines a physical quantity descriptor, an extensive state size.
so this size is related to something, like the m3 in density.
at the limits of a mathematical system there are always simplifications and independencies of solution parameters.
so it would be quite conceivable that general descriptive variables of our system here are getting independed to the number of the dimensions used for such a extensive state size.
would mean the number of the spatial dimensions in density of a black hole for example (above 10^6 kg/m3) are no more relevant. one could also write kg/m2 or kg/m, as the
magnitude of the scalar hits the limit and the scalar becomes a limit value.
now back to the limits of our system with that idea in mind.
the units are (ENERGY * TIME) and (MASS / SPACE). >compare units and enjoy chiasmus first. think about theory of relativity.
interestingly enough, we were able to determine planks effective quantum precisely (6.626070..*10^-34 Js), whereas the critical density is only blurred.
